WhatFinger

Putting females into those positions may give some a warm and fuzzy feeling, but it's a recipe for mission failure and the needless deaths of good men and women. And that's far too high a price to pay to make anyone feel good

The Weighty Issue of Body Armor and Women in Combat


The highly emotional debate over whether women should be allowed in combat positions in the U.S. military is back. The latest firefight was prompted when the only female officer enrolled in the Marine Corps' Infantry Officer Course dropped out after failing to complete two conditioning hikes, according to Corps' Training and Education Command. As a result, "There are no female officers enrolled or slated to attend" the course. Hillary Clinton, of course, supports it, because she's a "huge supporter of women being able to break whatever glass ceilings are holding them back." But so, alas, does Donald Trump. But this is an issue where neither politics nor ideology has any place--because it's a matter of life and death. The purpose of the military should be to accomplish violent overseas missions with minimal casualties. The military is not a democracy, and its purpose isn't to provide equal opportunity or break "glass ceilings." It is highly discriminatory, based not on skin color or religion but ability.
Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy


CFP Comments

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments


Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Recommended by Canada Free Press


Subscribe

Sponsored