By Robert Laurie ——Bio and Archives--December 23, 2014
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Civil rights leaders Sunday condemned the ambush killings of two New York police officers and expressed fear that the backlash over the bloodshed could derail the protest movement that has grown out of the deaths of Michael Brown and Eric Garner… Similarly, the Rev. Al Sharpton, who has called for peaceful protests, condemned “eye-for-an-eye” violence and called it absurd to blame protesters or politicians for the officers’ deaths.Sharpton made the comments during a press conference on Sunday, where he appeared with Garner's widow and mother. He went on to claim that his movement is:
“...a pursuit of justice to make the city work fairly for everyone. This is not about trying to take things in our own hands. That does not solve the problem of police misconduct. If we go into a area where’s it’s an eye for an eye, then it is only a matter of who can out-plunk eyes, rather than who can make the system fair.”
“I have instructed our attorneys last night, I have began receiving threatening phone calls and hate. I’ll play one because I’m turning this over to the FBI."First of all, if Al Sharpton is receiving threats, he should probably call the cops. We're sure they're eager to help him out. They're undoubtedly big fans - especially since, just one week ago, his ultra-peaceful "Million Marchers" were wandering down the street chanting "What do we want? Dead Cops. When do we want them? Now." Maybe when they said they wanted "dead cops now" they were just "speaking colloquially." Secondly, why would anyone, anywhere, believe Sharpton's nasty little voice mails are genuine? This man has made a career out of phony accusations - beginning with Tawana Brawley's fake rape claims. Those, of course, were leveled against... Oh right. Cops. There's no reason to assume that the current threats weren't phoned in by one of his accomplices. ...And even if they weren't, so what? All of this - the alleged threats included - is exactly what Sharpton and his cohorts wanted. He's been fomenting hate, riots, violence, and death since his track suit days, most notably in the case of the Crown Heights riots back in the early 90's. He couldn't possibly care less about the death of two police officers, nor is he interested in the pain their families are now forced to endure. He sees an exploitable situation, riles up a bunch of easily manipulated sheep, and turns them lose on a neighborhood. After the chaos dies down, he gets in front of the cameras, outlines his new fundraising strategy, and then spends a few minutes trying claim that he had nothing to do with the creation of the situation in the first place. If he receives a few threats in the process, that's just sauce for the goose. He can - on top of proclaiming his innocence, paint himself as a victim. So far, that blueprint has gained him an MSNBC show and repeated audiences with some of America's most prominent politicians. This is - to a T - his modus operandi.
View Comments
Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com
Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.