Assange deserves stiff punishment for putting US in peril

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The United States may soon have the opportunity to request the extradition of Julian Assange to the United States. The U.S. can then finally begin criminal proceedings against him for the crimes he has committed. It is clear that Assange has a single-focused mission to cause momentous damage and harm to the United States by disclosing secret and highly classified information. Now he can finally be held accountable.

Let’s put this in context. I am a strong supporter of exposing government corruption and wrongdoing. I also believe the appropriate mechanism of last resort is through whistleblowers. When all other means have been exhausted whistleblowers have the responsibility to approach the proper authorities to expose illegal or unethical conduct. Whistleblowers are an avenue for exposing government wrongdoing. While there needs to be increased protection for government whistleblowers, an imperfect process does exist that allows for the identification of abuses while protecting national security interests. Whistleblowers in the intelligence community, including those working in the Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency, have paths outlined in a precise manner. That allows for the exposure of corruption, protects classified information, and insures that whistleblowers do not face retaliation. This is a balanced approach and protects all parties.

---

Those that operate outside of the process like Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden, the recent leakers at the CIA and those who leaked the information on Mike Flynn are criminals. They had broken the law and ignored avenues established for whistleblowers. Accordingly, Manning was charged and convicted. Edward Snowden should be tried and convicted and the recent leakers on Mike Flynn and those at the CIA must be too. These leakers have all assumed much larger roles than their jobs allowed. They perceived themselves to be the only “morally correct people” with the authority and the judgment to determine right and wrong, what information needed to be in the public domain or kept secret, and whether its exposure was warranted even though it was classified as “secret”. No one gave the leakers these authorities or this 20/20 judgment. They assumed it for themselves. It in turn jeopardized the security of the country. They may also have risked the security of their colleagues by disclosing such sensitive information. Julian Assange is no different. While he may not have actually “stolen” the information, Assange claimed possession of those stolen materials and published them for the world to see. His public comments and actions clearly outline his motives.

---

Support Canada Free Press

---

Julian Assange has an inherent desire to fundamentally damage and destroy the West with a focus and emphasis on the United States. Assange’s attacks, while considerably “international”, have focused primarily on the West, but more specifically, on the U.S. His actions have never included measures against Russia, China or other countries significantly less free and open than those in the West. There will be thousands of pages of legal debate that will be written about Assange. The debate will discuss whether or not he should be protected from prosecution because his actions represent a new media and therefore is sheltered by “free speech”. I’m hopeful that the future for Assange is that he is criminally charged and convicted for his illicit behavior towards the United States. The courts and a jury will, in the end, determine his fate. It is crucial that the trial take place. Julian Assange has done significant damage to our national security. That has been his expressed intent. Today’s legal framework should recognize this and find him guilty. And if a trial results in Julian Assange finding a safe haven to protect him from conviction, then we will need to recognize that our laws are inadequate and must be updated. Edward Snowden demonstrated that Bradley Manning was not an anomaly. Manning was just the first. He represented a new wave of traitors that have caused significant damage through the availability of data in cyberspace. As a result, we will inevitably come to realize that Julian Assange will only be the first of many to take mass quantities of data to the public. Moving forward in this new era, Congress must strengthen whistleblower protections, direct our intelligence agencies to better secure sensitive and classified data and put in place a modern legal framework to prosecute those that leak and make available classified information. These measures will ultimately protect the United States and its citizens from traitors and individuals seeking its demise. A former Chairman of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee, Pete Hoekstra is a senior fellow at the Investigative Project on Terrorism and a graduate of the University of Michigan’s School of Business. Readers may write him at IPT, 5614 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 34, Washington, D.C. 20015