By Robert Laurie ——Bio and Archives--May 8, 2017
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
"There's nothing there from that standpoint that we've seen directly linking our President to any of that."Put another tick in the "disappointed journalist" column. Look, the essential point here is that Democrats - and their media allies - love this game. Since they know they have no evidence of collusion, no legitimate accuser, and no proof that Russia even impacted the election, the question itself becomes the accusation. I've seen a few Democrats defend the "just asking" course of action by claiming conservatives did the same thing with Benghazi, but that's simply not true. In that case, there was direct evidence of a top-level lie about the YouTube video, accusations of stand-down orders made by people on the ground who were willing to come forward, four dead Americans, and a lost consulate. There were demonstrable lies, very public accusers, and a quantifiable impact. Here, we have nothing but innuendo. ...And even that's failing.
View Comments
Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain.com
Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.