Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright is merely stating the obvious when she tells us she’d be willing to sign up as a Muslim if only there were such a thing as a “Muslim Registry”.
In reaction to reports indicating President Donald Trump plans on suspending the U.S.’s refugee program for 120 days, Albright hit the Tweet send button Wednesday, saying she is prepared to register as a Muslim in “solidarity”.
In all ways other than officially registering as one, Albright is a Muslim.
Albright claims she is following in the footsteps of the pink pu**y cap promoting feminist Gloria Steinhem, who unabashedly vows to become Muslim if there is ever a registry.
Both women are standing in line with countless others for a fictional Muslim Registry that is as likely to happen as Rosie O’Donnell and Michael Moore letting up on President Donald Trump.
In reality, these would-be Burka Babes are tossing away their patriotism by threatening sworn membership to a faux Muslim registry.
Albright and Steinhem know very well that there will never be a Muslim Registry because most Westerners aspiring to be Muslims count on the convenient cover of the provision of anonymity.
Jihadists, now well aware of it, remain eternally grateful to Women’s Rights activists for patently ignoring the rights of women cancelled by oppressive Islam.
That the feminists and lib-left are in bed with Islam was obvious in Saturday’s Big Women’s March.
Pink pu**y caps and hijab wearing protesters marching together, 2 million strong worldwide, is the proof that should be sounding alarm bells throughout the West.
The Islamists and lib left seek the same thing: to subjugate all citizens under their anti-American, anti-freedom, anti-Christian way of life.
They want to stamp out forever all Western values and bury them like the ashes of millions of ‘legally’ aborted babies.
Old guard, aspiring Muslims like Albright and Steinhem will continue to lure younger rootless members to their marches by deceitfully stating they will be the first to sign up as Muslims when a Muslim Registry becomes available, knowing that it never will.
Growing a youthful membership for their cause is easy when Muslims can be portrayed as victims by fanning the raging fire of hatred for a president determined to return U.S. sovereignty by building a wall.
Simple to gin up sympathy by cunningly categorizing all mostly male migrants as helpless refugees targeted by bigoted Islamophobes.
Millions of millennials taking to the streets think it is radical Islam that deserves sympathy and not the victims of their worldwide rampage.
After all, if a former President like Barack Hussein Obama can be a Muslim sympathizer, why not them?
One day before their march and in his last hours as president, Obama sent $221 million to the Palestinians.
“Officials say the Obama administration in its waning hours defied Republican opposition and quietly released $221 million to the Palestinian Authority. (ABC News, Jan. 23, 2017)
“GOP members of Congress had been holding up the money.
“A State Department official and several congressional aides say the outgoing administration formally notified Congress it would spend the money Friday morning, just before Donald Trump became president.
Obama gave 25 times more to the Palestinian Authority with $221 million, than the $4 million he gave as a parting gift to climate change programs, the same global warming/ climate change he insists is more dangerous to mankind than radical Islam, and the $1.25 million he gifted to U.N. organizations.
Meanwhile, you don’t have to be a registered Muslim to be a recognized Muslim.
Obama, Albright, Steinhem and countless members of the defiant lib-left are walking proof of it.
Copyright © Canada Free Press
Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and Glenn Beck.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2017 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2017 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement