By Matthew Vadum -- BombThrowers——Bio and Archives--August 2, 2017
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
centers around Obamacare’s cost-sharing subsidies, which provide additional assistance to help low-income individuals pay for things like co-payments and deductibles. While the Obamacare law explicitly appropriated funds to subsidize premiums on insurance exchanges, it did not provide such an appropriation for these cost-sharing subsidies. The Obama administration acknowledged this in 2013, requesting such an appropriation from the House of Representatives. But months later, the administration did an about-face and proceeded to start paying cost-sharing subsidies to insurers. The House viewed this action as a unilateral usurpation of its most important constitutional prerogative — to fund, or refuse to fund, government programs.Rejecting what she called the "extra-textual arguments" advanced by the Obama administration, Judge Collyer found
Paying out [cost-sharing subsidies] without an appropriation thus violates the Constitution. Congress authorized reduced cost sharing [in Obamacare] but did not appropriate monies for it, in the [Fiscal Year] 2014 budget or since. Congress is the only source for such an appropriation, and no public money can be spent without one.So if it is true that President Trump and congressional Republicans are refusing to appropriate the funding Narechania is griping about, they are on the side of the constitutional angels, not saboteurs. Of course, sabotaging Obamacare would be fair game, and it would be nice if Republicans actually tried to do that. But they haven't, so Organizing for Action is — surprise, surprise — caught in a lie.
View Comments
Matthew Vadum, matthewvadum.blogspot.com, is an investigative reporter.
His new book Subversion Inc. can be bought at Amazon.com (US), Amazon.ca (Canada)
Visit the Subversion Inc. Facebook page. Follow me on Twitter.