WhatFinger

Counter the narrative

Republican congresswoman: My son has a pre-existing condition, and that's why I voted for the AHCA



The left/media narrative on people with pre-existing conditions is one of the most dishonest I've ever heard. To listen to them, you'd think everyone who is sick will be tossed off their insurance by the AHCA. Here's the truth: First, the concern about pre-existing conditions deals solely with people who don't currently have insurance and want to get it. That is a very small subset of the overall population of people who have some sort of health issue. If you already have insurance, and you're sick or you get sick, nothing changes for you. The problem is what to do with people who have been going without insurance - or had it but lost it - and now want to get coverage from an insurer that will understand from day one that this person will cost them much more than they will pay in premiums.
ObamaCare requires insurers to simply issue policIes to these people and cover them the same as everyone else. The is politically popular because it sounds compassionate. But it's an economic mess, and it's causing everyone's premiums to soar while insurers back out of markets because they can't make any money. The challenge in replacing ObamaCare is how to make sure people don't lose everything as a result of an illness, while not distorting insurance pools for everyone else so no one can afford it. Contrary to the media coverage of this issue, the AHCA absolutely contains a provision to help people with pre-existing conditions. And Republican Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers understand full well the importance of it, because her son Cole has Down Syndrome. She voted for the AHCA precisely because it meets her family's needs much better than ObamaCare ever did:
With Obamacare, our health- insurance system relies on younger, healthier people subsidizing the costs of the older and sicker. As a result, insurance costs consistently increase to cover the costs of people who are considered “high-risk,” namely those who are sick or who have preexisting conditions. High-risk pools and reinsurance programs at the state level address this concern and have been successful in the past. Our plan establishes a program to provide federal resources for states to create high-risk pools, reduce out-of-pocket costs or promote better access to services. States know better than the federal government how to allocate and manage resources to address the needs of their people. Our plan allows states to serve and provide financial support directly to vulnerable populations, including people with preexisting conditions. We’ve seen this system work before — just look at Maine. After the state created an “invisible” high-risk pool (“invisible” because it did not cordon off people with preexisting conditions from the traditional market) and relaxed its premium rating rules in 2011, people with preexisting conditions continued to have access to health care and their premiums were cut in half. Young and healthy people could finally afford to enter the market, and prices stabilized even further. This approach was more personal, reasonable and innovative than anything a bureaucrat in D.C. could have imagined.

To me, protecting people with preexisting conditions isn’t just good policy — it’s a personal mission

To me, protecting people with preexisting conditions isn’t just good policy — it’s a personal mission.
The high-risk pools contained in the AHCA will cost taxpayers some money, no doubt about it. They essentially serve as a stand-in for a private market that couldn't possibly exist because it would be a guaranteed money loser from day one. So why have such a pool? In business there are concepts known as loss leaders. You know they will cost you money but they set you up to make even more money in other areas. The loss leader that is the high-risk pool allows everyone else to obtain insurance in an entirely separate, and much less expensive, pool. It also helps make it possible for the AHCA to repeal the individul mandate and the essential benefits requirement, which means you can buy coverage for what you want, and not for what the government says you must be covered for. This is going to make health insurance work much, much, much better for 96 percent of those who are insured, while accepting that some taxpayer funds will be necessary to meet the needs of the other 4 percent. It's not perfect, but it's much better than ObamaCare, which taints the risk pool for everyone by throwing all policyholders together and refusing to allow insurers to treat anyone differently than anyone else - even though some people obviously represent far greater risks than others.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate

Those claiming the AHCA throws people with pre-existing conditions off their insurance are either flat-out lying

And those claiming the AHCA throws people with pre-existing conditions off their insurance are either flat-out lying or have no idea what they're talking about. Rep. McMorris Rodgers has a personal stake in this, which is why she made sure the legislation was written to meet the needs of people with pre-existing conditions, as well as the parents of children with pre-existing conditions. Stop following the lead of hysterical people on social media and find out what the bill really does for people with pre-existing conditions. If you do, you'll have an entirely different perspective, and you'll understand better why ObamaCare isn't working and has to be replaced.

Subscribe

View Comments

Dan Calabrese——

Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain

Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.


Sponsored