WhatFinger

Game changer

Trump budget chief nominee Mick Mulvaney a huge advocate of spending cuts



””
Of all the excellent cabinet and staff picks Donald Trump has announced thus far, there may be none bigger than the choice of U.S. Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-South Carolina) as director of the Office of Management and Budget. The federal government faces no more urgent challenge than $20 trillion in debt and no existing plan but to add more of it through deficits as far as they eye can see. Mulvaney is not just a fiscal conservative in word. He was a fierce critic of former House Speaker John Boehner over Boehner's unwillingness to stand up to Barack Obama on spending measures. A lot of us felt the same way. Boehner had the power of the purse, and the federal government couldn't spend a time if the Republican-controlled House didn't authorize it. But Boehner was afraid to go to battle with Obama for fear of a "government shutdown" that the media would blame on Republicans.
But you don't need to shut down the government to cut spending if the president also wants to cut spending, and Trump's choice of Mulvaney suggests he very much wants to do so:
“We are going to do great things for the American people with Mick Mulvaney,” Trump said Saturday in an e-mailed statement. “Right now we are nearly $20 trillion in debt, but Mick is a very high-energy leader with deep convictions for how to responsibly manage our nation’s finances and save our country from drowning in red ink.” Since arriving in Congress as part of the Republican Tea Party wave elected in 2010, Mulvaney has been one of the most pugilistic advocates for cutting government spending. “The Trump administration will restore budgetary and fiscal sanity back in Washington after eight years of an out-of-control, tax-and-spend financial agenda, ” Mulvaney, 49, of South Carolina said in the statement. “Each day, families across our nation make disciplined choices about how to spend their hard-earned money, and the federal government should exercise the same discretion that hardworking Americans do every day.” In 2011 he co-authored a measure passed by the House that would have slashed spending while conditioning a $2.4 trillion debt-ceiling increase on passage of a constitutional amendment to balance the budget and make it harder to raise taxes.

He also helped lead an effort to defund or delay Obamacare that resulted in a 16-day government shutdown in 2013. As OMB chief, he would run the office responsible for implementing future shutdowns should they occur. Expect to hear lots of media jabbering about "shutdowns," but all of this misses one very important detail: Shutting down the government was only an issue because the Republican Congress wanted to cut spending and the Democrat president refused. Obama engaged in brinkmanship in order to get his way, which was continued runaway spending, knowing full well that the GOP had to either endure the shutdown battle or cave - because the media was on Obama's side and there was no reason for Obama to ever give in.
With Trump in the White House, supporting Mulvaney's budget-cutting instincts, there is no reason to think we'll see any such brinkmanship again. Everyone is on the same side here. Now, having said that, we have yet to see how $1 trillion in new infrastructure spending fits into an overall imperative to spend less. But it's not impossible. It's just a matter of prioritizing certain things over others. That's a hard job, but it's one Mulvaney seems ready for. And it's extremely encouraging to see that Trump wants him to do it. Final question: How stupid do #NeverTrump conservatives feel right about now?

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Dan Calabrese——

Dan Calabrese’s column is distributed by HermanCain.com, which can be found at HermanCain

Follow all of Dan’s work, including his series of Christian spiritual warfare novels, by liking his page on Facebook.


Sponsored