By Daniel Greenfield ——Bio and Archives--May 7, 2009
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
"A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. "The idea Lincoln put forward here, was similar to the ideas that Eisenhower, Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan would put forward during the Cold War. That states of free men and slaves could not co-exist for long. Sooner or later either the free men will become slaves, or the slaves will become free. In the Communist era that meant that either free countries would become Communist, or Communist countries would become free. So too with Islam, the same balance exists. Either free nations will become Muslim, or Muslim nations will become free. We can see the consequences of that playing out now in Europe, where nations of free men are becoming slaves. In reverse we see the possibility in Iraq of slaves becoming free men. Lincoln however was not speaking globally but locally-- and it is the local that concerns us now. Today 150 years later America is once again half-slave and half-free. Slavery no longer means cotton plantations and slave markets. Instead slavery today exists in a more insidious form of bureaucracies and social service agencies. Pages after pages of regulations and forms to fill out. Advisory committees that become authorities and taxation that quickly mutates into confiscation. The bottom line though is very clear. Slavery represents a fairly simple social contract that says, "Give me your freedom and I will see that you're taken care of." The simplest way to describe modern slavery in the United States today is with another "S" word. Socialism. Socialism is modern slavery. It is slavery disguised by high minded ideals, but so was the original slavery. American Liberals, like the Slaveholders of the Pre-Civil War era, presume that minorities are unfit to take care of themselves without someone to take care of them and tell them what to do and how to live. That of course is why socialism's thrust is so focused on minorities in the first place. But it isn't limited to minorities. Like Slavery, Socialism deprives people of the benefits of their labor... under the argument that they aren't wise or competent enough to use it to their own benefit, or to look after themselves. Socialism also creates a class of Masters, to oversee the general populace, look after their needs and tell them what to do. Those deprived of their labor through taxation are helping to underfund the Socialist Masters, to create their jobs, maintain their power and expand their organizations. And since slaveholding systems have no real room for anyone who isn't a Master or a Slave, anyone trying to remain independent, particularly small businessmen will be squeezed out, until they're in one category or the other. Like Slavery, Socialism needs to expand into free states. Like a Ponzi Scheme, Socialism constantly needs new territories and people in order to fund its own operations, which are always taking place at a loss. The following quote nicely sums up the state of affairs;
>"...At the present rate, as I see it, by the year 2000 everybody is either going to be on welfare or administering it. I see no middle ground at all. Just consider the statistics." Unit Supervisor, NYC Department of Welfare, 1964In its own way this quote is every bit as powerful as Lincoln's. A statement of manifest destiny for social services to expand from ocean to ocean, to include everybody in the system. Just as Slaveholding systems devalue free labor, forcing everyone into the Master or Slave category.... Socialism also devalues free labor, forcing everyone to either work in the government, or work for the government. Lincoln's response to this expansionism was to point out that if it went on, America would no longer be half-slave and half-free. It would be either all free as the result of abolishing slavery-- or it would be all slave because slavery had spread to every state in the union. We are facing the same situation today. To reformulate Lincoln's words, "American cannot continue as a nation, half-socialist and half-free. Either one will fall or the other. Either all the states and every state and city, town and village will become socialist. Or all will become free."
View Comments
Daniel Greenfield is a New York City writer and columnist. He is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center and his articles appears at its Front Page Magazine site.