For science, the term ‘settled’ is synonymous with the words static and stagnant. All are the antithesis of the very meaning of science. Science can only advance a hypothesis to a theory with a substantial burden of proof. To become a Law of Science, a concept must never be violated. Acceptance and advancement through these levels is only by repeatable, empirical measurements.
The founding fathers of the English Scientific Method understood this principle and announced it in the naming of the world’s first scientific society in 1661. The greatest minds in science founded
The Royal Society for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge by Experiment. The very name of this organization indicated the importance of the empirical measurement to understanding.
Then, as now, science required more than imagination and determination, it required funding. Since those with the greatest minds are seldom those with the most assets, the name was changed before being granted a charter by King Charles to,
The Royal Society of London for Promoting Natural Knowledge. Apparently the term ‘experiment’ was abhorrent to elitists even back then.
The Laws of Motion by Issac Newton were the first Laws of science and published in 1689. Important to today the greatest science question is the Laws of Thermodynamics. The term was first used by Thompson in 1849 and involved work by a dozen great scientists over the entire nineteenth century. It was finally codified as Law, in the late nineteenth century. Climate change is in reality a thermodynamic action. All bodies create, store and transfer heat in a predictable manner.
On a precise level heat (or energy) is transferred based on exact concentrations and a value, unique to each substance, called specific heat. In general terms, the greater the density the slower the rate of change in temperature, the greater the level of energy required to make a change and the greater the heat storage capacity.
A cubic foot of water weighs 62.4 lbs fresh or 64.3 lbs if sea water. An average cubic foot of dirt, or rock or concrete weighs 125 lbs. In general, it takes twice as much energy to raise a cubic foot of an earth solid than a cubic foot of water by the same amount of temperature. The same principle applies to air but with an additional complication.
Air is highly compressible. A cubic foot of air has a linear reduction in density with altitude. But under any condition, a cubic foot of atmospheric pressure air will heat and cool, with less energy and in less time than either a cubic foot of water or solid. As a percentage of total mass, the atmosphere is 0.00008% and the oceans just 0.009% of the total planet mass. The Earth has 310 million cubic miles of liquid water. If the solid surface was completely smooth there would be less than ½ mile of water covering the planet. Since water has half the thermal storage capacity of the land, it is reasonable to compare the liquid volume heat storage capacity with ¼ mile of solid material.
The core of the Earth is heated STRICTLY by Geo-nuclear energy. The decay of heavy elements, under extreme heat, pressure and particle bombardment, decay and release enormous amounts of energy. The core is estimated to be between 8 and 10,000 F and all of this energy flows through the solid, liquid and atmosphere into the void of space on a continuous basis. Volcanoes release Geo-nuclear energy and are obviously not constant.
The global warmist would have you believe that out of all this mass it is the 0.0004% CO2 of the 0.00008% that is the atmosphere’s total planetary mass that controls the entire weather cycle. Your chances of winning the Power Ball Lottery are far greater than ALL of the atmospheric carbon dioxide having any measurable effect on this system. Human contribution to atmospheric CO2 is just 3% of the 0.0004% of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Volcanoes produce heat, ash, carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide. These are primary effects of Geo-nuclear energy. There are those who claim that climate change is the result of sunlight reflections due to ‘particles’ in the air. This change in solar absorption is a ‘secondary’ effect of Geo-nuclear reactions.
There are those who claim that climate change is the result of changes in the temperature of ocean currents. The primary force that changes ocean temperature is the energy flow through the floor of Geo-nuclear energy. Almost every event that is claimed to cause climate change is in reality a secondary effect from only two primary forces. Those two primary forces are the fusion of the Sun and the fission of the Earth.
The Popsicle Planet
During the Neoproterozoic Period, 700 million years ago the land mass was a single continent with one great ocean. The planet was covered with two massive ice caps. The northern cap extended south to present day Miami, the southern cap extended north to Rio De Janeiro. A thirty degree band of open-ocean and exposed land was home to algae and single celled life forms.
Then carbon dioxide levels SOARED TO 350 TIMES PRESENT LEVELS and the ocean floor and the single great continent split and began to drift apart. The 10 million year long ice age came to an end in less than 1 million years as the Earth’s nuclear heater fired up, releasing massive heat, ash and CO2. Life-forms rapidly adapted to this new rich and warm environment.
This ended a previous cycle of massive ice ages that have never been repeated on this scale. The Sun is predicted to have been 7% cooler at this time, but this is the amount of variation is currently experienced by Earth in our annual rotation. Some event, possibly a massive Solar or Galactic radiation wave, triggered the Geo-nuclear reaction which established a new normal for Earth’s climate.
The False Idol Before Us
This author has produced thirty climate related articles with as many scientific facts as this article, which ask the obvious questions and provide obvious alternatives to the AGW group think. Other fine scientists and scholars have written entire books on these same defects in the AGW orthodoxy. What is the cause of this bad science effect ?
Long ago evil forces captured the ‘two party system’ and set up a ‘two party puppet show’. The DNC and the RNC are then played against each other as a pretext for debate and democracy. These evil forces created the same false dichotomy for their ‘scientific’ propaganda tool, their parlor trick for the masses. Where a single ‘government scientist’ dictate could appear biased, a false duality has the mantle of respectability.
Thus we have the National Academy of Science and the National Science Foundation.
The NAS is ‘Science.edu’ and the NSF is ‘Science.gov’ creating the appearance of two great guardians joined for the benefit of the masses. The evil forces then directed that Dot-Edu and Dot-Gov were to provide the appearance that human energy use was rapidly changing the planet, as if change had never occurred before, like maybe Popsicle Planet.
Desperate for funds to continue their experiments the original founders of the English Scientific Method reached out to wealthy benefactors with weekly, when possible, displays of the latest in scientific research. Science became then, as now, a parlor trick event for the elite, only this time it is a weapon for robbery.
In the eighteenth century the elite enrolled in the new science club and there was no longer any need for ‘knowledge by experiment’ or the ‘promoting of natural knowledge’ to this once great club. It was henceforth referred to as just the
Royal Society.
To believe that the miniscule amount of a human caused gas, that is a miniscule amount of the atmosphere, which is a miniscule amount of the total mass of this Earth system, can cause any change, will be forever viewed as the greatest example of cognitive dissonance in all of history. It is the stagnant body that produces pathogens and toxins on the planet. If the forces that have created this fraud do succeed, then humanity will indeed be condemned to a thousand years of darkness, or we can now turn on the light.
[Find out more on the glorious past and shameful present of the Royal Society by reading “
East Anglia Event Horizon”, “
Nullius In Verba” and ”
Overcoming Climate Inertia” all posted at Canada Free Press]
