WhatFinger

It’s an overwhelming science communication challenge.

Only one-quarter of Britons think risks of climate change outweigh the benefits



By Eric Berger, Chron.com The private think-tank Ipsos recently surveyed more than 2,000 Britons aged 16 and above about their attitudes toward science. A news release about the survey findings says nothing about climate change.

But if you actually dig into the topline results there’s a startling finding with regard to climate change. I’m speaking of question Q11F, which asked respondents: From what you know or have heard about climate change, which of these statements, if any, most closely reflects your own opinion? The following table shows the results of the survey (middle column) along with results of a similar question asked in 2004-2005 (far-right).

Don't let the Watermelons kill the Shale Gas Revolution

By James Delingpole, UK Telegraph Imagine if we were to discover a new form of cheap, clean energy so abundant that it will provide our needs at least for the next two centuries, freeing us from the pervasive early 21st century neurosis of having to worry about “peak oil” or “conserving scarce resources”, causing a worldwide economic boom and with the added side-benefit of creating more fertiliser so that we can not only heat our homes more cheaply than ever before but also eat more cheaply than ever before. Imagine how Environmentalists would react if such a miracle came into being. Actually we don’t need to imagine for the miracle is already here. It’s called Shale Gas and is the subject of a thrilling new report for the Global Warming Policy Foundation by Matt Ridley with a foreword by Professor Freeman Dyson. Neither Ridley nor Dyson is in much doubt that shale gas is the answer to our prayers.

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

News on the Net——

News from around the world


Sponsored
!-- END RC STICKY -->