Big question on Syria should not be why America is going into Syria, but who America is sending into Syria
Welcome to the ‘United States of al-Qaeda’
Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Look out Free World: Here Comes the USA—the newly minted ‘United States of al-Qaeda’.
The ‘United States of al-Qaeda’ is the first hard evidence of President Barack Obama’s Fundamental Transformation of America, which in effect throws all U.S. citizens in with the terrorists known as al-AQaeda; a new kind of military of which no one can be proud.
It was in 2008 when running for the presidency, that Barack Obama declared he would someday soon lead a civilian army of his very own: “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we set. We gotta’ have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” (Barack Obama, July 2, 2008).
To a majority of the American population, it may no longer be “our military” but Obama’s ‘United States of al-Qaeda’.
Back when Obama was talking about having his own army, no one in the mainstream media took him at his word. Whipped up during a campaign where people actually fainted at the sight of him, voters sent the man who vowed to lead his own army to the Oval office in a landslide election that was to change America forever.
Surrealism not withstanding, it somehow fits the script that the senator who ran against him for the presidency is now Obama’s biggest booster for war on Syria when he’s not playing iPhone poker during senate hearings.
Up until now we’ve seen no signs of Obama’s civilian army in action, but the ‘United States of al-Qaeda’ is soon coming to a new war near you.
Amid all the grandstanding, among the incessant chatter of the talking heads on television and in the fog of war as planned with players like the Johns, Boehner and Kerry, in on the act, it’s hard to decipher what kind of war has been declared on Syria.
To date, five extra destroyers and a carrier group have been dispatched to the Mediterranean Sea. And a cell of 50 CIA-trained soldiers will reportedly cross the border into Syria by stealth today.
At yesterday’s hour-long meeting at the White House, Obama gave general support to doing more for the Syrian rebels—the Syrian rebels being al-Qaeda.
John (Allahu Akbar) McCain said later in an interview that “Mr. Obama did not say specifically what weapons might be provided to the opposition or discuss in detail what Syrian targets might be attacked”.
“There was no concrete agreement. ‘O.K., we got a deal,’” Mr. McCain said. “Like a lot of things, the devil is in the details”. (The New York Times, Sept. 2, 2013).
Is that devil in the details Obama’s personal army, the one “that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the one the world has seen to date?
Is it possible that the 50 CIA-trained ‘soldiers’ sneaking across the Syrian border today are members of Obama’s Civilian National Security Force in military disguise?
With only 29.5 percent of American population approval, would any sincerely patriotic soldier now in the US Military follow the orders of a commander in chief who would send them to fight side-by-side with al-Qaeda?
People worldwide should be really worried about the Marxist/Muslim Brotherhood-cunning lurking in Obama’s latest move.
Since June, the imminent US attack on Syria has owned the news and has virtually preempted issues that really matter to Americans: the coming-down-the-pike first dose of ObamaCare scheduled three and a half weeks from now; Republican Marco Rubio-greased Amnesty; congressional silence on the out-of-control budget and debt limit; decreasing-by-day jobs; the admitted spying on citizens by the NSA, FBI, DHS; control of conservative groups at the whim of the IRS; the coming up to one-year anniversary of an unresolved Benghazi, among other Obama-led scandals.
The only ‘new’ news since Syria shot up to the top of the list is how the Republicans are backing Obama on his Syria attack. While the people who voted them in wrongly assumed the Repubs were fighting off the Dems on the debt ceiling, they were only getting ready to go off to war.
How America could go from fighting off al-Qaeda to fighting beside al-Qaeda in the 12 years since September 11, 2001 is mind boggling.
Why are Republicans like House Leader John Boehner and sidekick Eric Cantor caving in without a fight to every Obama demand? Do they fear personal al-Qaeda retaliation, or does Obama have the goods on them?
Have the Valerie Jarrett-led unelected Obama czars been working these past five years grooming a civilian national security force for him while Obama has been MIA golfing and holidaying?
Meanwhile, the big question on Syria should not be why America is going into Syria, but who America is sending into Syria.Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives | Click to view Comments