WhatFinger


There is no crime in being up front with honesty and practices of fairness in vote casting when truth replaces theft of honor by deception

Why Do Most Democrats Oppose VOTER ID Laws? Cheating On Their Minds?



Why Do Most Democrats Oppose VOTER ID Laws?
In the past several years, elections, local, regional and national in particular have seen lawlessness at the voting polls in many areas of these once-squeaky-clean United States. And even when definite proof is available, such as the case in Ohio, where the number of votes for Democrats in the ballot tallies exceeded the total number of all eligible residents, Democrat, Republican, and all other voters registered in that area.
A very simple (and simple minded) case of the Party of Democrats breaking the law by having illegal persons casting votes or, even simpler, having their pawns visit different polling places and vote for Democrat candidates as many times as they can get away with doing so. But even with that huge source of criminal evidence available for either prosecution or at the very least, a total recount with excessive votes discarded and removed from the "winning" tally of any particular voting poll, the proper and required illegal votes in question have never been placed where they belonged: in the trash basket. And worse, the offending so-called individuals have never had to stand before the people to explain their misgivings and lawlessness, and the election results without credence were accepted as if the matter was valid. Which is a far cry from America's constitutional requirements and evidence of Democrat's slippage in popularity in voting polls requiring lawlessness and un-American-like cheating. Factcheck.org is a reliable source for ascertaining legitimate information when requested. Below are examples of Democratic illegalities in vote poll tallying that, to my knowledge, have yet neither been overturned or prosecuted for their unlawfulness.

Support Canada Free Press


(Excerpts from Factcheck😊 Most everyone suspected fraud, but these numbers prove it, and our government and media refuse to do anything about it. As each state reported their final election details, the evidence of voter fraud is astounding. Massive voter fraud has been reported in areas of OH and FL, with PA, WI and VA; all are deploying personnel to investigate election results. Here are just a few examples of what has surfaced with much more to come.
  • In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).
  • In 21 districts in Wood County, Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).
  • In Wood County, Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters.
These three citations of lawlessness on the part of the Democratic Party should be enough to motivate a desire to cleanse the filth from the obvious illegalities of the voting tallies in those elements of Philadelphia, PA, and Wood County, OH. However, it is my assumption that such cleansing efforts would involve counter-charges of "blatant Racism" from the Democrat leadership-prompted opponents of such an investigation. Imagine the clamor that would ensue should the opposition parties in the elections demand an organized recount and factual individual vote count in each of those localities and the charging of law breaking to be attempted on those Democrats who supervised the polls in Philadelphia, along with those similar enforcers who illegally removed the GOP inspectors from their polling stations. Armageddon, anyone? The above comments I made against just two different locations in Pennsylvania and Ohio should be ammunition enough to demand a total federal examination by a new Federal Justice Department when the Democrats are deposed in November. But in the event that opposition still lingers with the departure of the un-American Justice providers, here are more examples from the URL above that could be added to the odiferous two already mentioned.
  • In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.
  • The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL, had a 158% voter turnout.
  • Palm Beach County, FL, had a 141% voter turnout.
  • In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters.
If the above doesn't convince you of why the Democrats are so adamantly opposed to voter reforms -- Photo ID in particular -- you would make an outstanding candidate for membership in the Communist Party or apply for admission to become an Islamic terrorist. Or, as an alternate, create and recruit for Deceivers Unanimous.org But we should not give up hope for all of America's Democrats; in the Washington Examiner was found an editorial titled, "Democrats losing long war against voter ID" by John Fund and Hans Von Spakovsky, October 6, 2014, which gave hopeful information that some formerly entrenched Democratic viewpoints were beginning to clear the air for an anesthetized atmosphere of new clear-headedness as follows with this assessment:
"Voter support for cleaner elections is strong and is attracting support in some Democratic states. Rhode Island Secretary of State Ralph Mollis, a Democrat, persuaded his state's left-leaning legislature to pass a photo ID bill in 2011 to address problems of voter fraud in Providence and other cities. It included extensive outreach efforts, with members of Mollis' office going to senior centers, homeless shelters and community centers to process free IDs. The law has been implemented smoothly, Mollis says, and he views it as a national model. "When the day is done, my job is to maintain the integrity of elections," he says. "Even if a state doesn't have an immediate problem with fraud, doesn't it make sense to take sensible precautions rather than wait for someone to abuse the system, and then it's too late?"
Very well stated, Secretary Mollis; there is no crime in being up front with honesty and practices of fairness in vote casting when truth replaces theft of honor by deception. But in a timely, perhaps untimely breaking story, an Obama big-time rear-end-kissing federal court judge has just, on October 10, 2014, struck down a Texas state law authorizing the Voter ID law for that state. In an obvious sycophantic move, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division, Nelva Gonzalez Ramos, like a good little lackey, he is giving "pay-back" for his appointment as a groveling, obsequious sycophant that he now has become. Thankfully, for the good and respectful citizens of Texas, the prospects for over-turning the comfy District Judge by the 5th Circuit Court are favorable, continuing Obama's slip-sliding in Texas and elsewhere.


View Comments

Jerry McConnell -- Bio and Archives

Gerald A. “Jerry” McConnell, 92, of Hampton, died Sunday, February 19, 2017, at the Merrimack Valley Hospice House in Haverhill, Mass., surrounded by his loved ones. He was born May 27, 1924 in Altoona, Pa., the fifth son of the late John E. and Grace (Fletcher) McConnell.

Jerry served ten years with the US Marine Corps and participated in the landing against Japanese Army on Guadalcanal and another ten years with the US Air Force. After moving to Hampton in 1957 he started his community activities serving in many capacities.

 

He shared 72 years of marriage with his wife Betty P. (Hamilton) McConnell. In addition to his wife, family members include nieces and nephews.

 

McConnell’s e-book about Guadalcanal, “Our Survival was Open to the Gravest Doubts

 


Sponsored