WhatFinger

Retailers believe in creating better opportunities for their employees. But they believe that careers, not time clocks, are the answer

Overtime proposal would cost the workers it’s meant to help


By Guest Column -- Matthew Shay——--June 25, 2015

American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us


WASHINGTON, D.C.—Critics claim retail is an industry of low-wage, part-time jobs. That’s not true, of course, and recent research from GfK and Oxford Economics provides the facts to prove that retail offers competitive wages and vast opportunities for career advancement, that the majority of retail workers are happy and that those who have moved on say their retail experience helped get them their jobs.
Hiring managers from other industries say they value retail workers for their composure under pressure, willingness to “step up” and ability to take direction, work with anyone and multitask. Now, however, the Obama Administration is pushing a plan that would severely hamper retailers’ ability to provide a ladder to success for those looking to build a career. Ironically, the proposal—sold under the guise of increasing income for store-level managers—could force thousands of full-time career positions to be downgraded to part-time while doing little to increase most workers’ take-home pay. Under current regulations, workers making up to $455 a week are guaranteed overtime pay when they exceed 40 hours a week. Managers making more can be declared exempt but only if they meet conditions such as having supervision of other workers as their primary duty. Under the proposal, the administration wants to roughly double the salary threshold and severely restrict how much non-supervisory work managers can perform and still be exempt. The proposal would apply to all industries but seems expressly targeted at the retail sector.

It would cost many store managers and assistant managers their exemption from complicated overtime rules and keep them from doing what it takes to make their stores successful. For career-oriented managers, staying late isn’t a punishment—they think big-picture and know it’s an opportunity to wrap up loose ends or get a jump on the next day. Opening an extra cash register or helping a customer find an item increases store sales. Cleaning a bathroom, if it comes to that, boosts the store’s image. All of these actions improve a store’s performance, and managers whose stores have good performance receive bonuses or get promoted. So even if an extra hour of work doesn’t bring an immediate extra hour of pay, it pays off far more in the end. Under the plan, more than half a million career-path managers could become hourly workers. Retail companies would rely more on technology, which allows fewer managers to exert greater control, with the opportunity to move up diminished. And with mid-level professional ranks hollowed out, the retail industry’s pipeline of talent to be promoted from within would dry up. It’s not surprising then that the majority of retail managers oppose overtime expansion. A survey conducted by research firm GfK found 81 percent said it would impact customer service and three-quarters said it would diminish the effectiveness of their training and undermine their ability to lead employees by example. Another study from Oxford Economics found the proposal could add as much as $9.5 billion to payroll costs if fully implemented. But with the pool of payroll money limited in the still-tight economy, the study said most employers would be forced to lower base wages and reduce hours or benefits, with few workers seeing any net increase in bottom-line income. In addition, the proposal could result in nearly $1 billion in administrative costs—money that otherwise could go to job creation. The Oxford study found overtime expansion could create more than 100,000 new jobs—but this is one time when job creation is not good news. Rather than paying time-and-a-half, retailers could be forced to split good full-time jobs in two, so the new jobs would all be part-time positions. Would the administration’s proposal to expand overtime help American workers? The answer is clearly “no.” Retailers believe in creating better opportunities for their employees. But they believe that careers, not time clocks, are the answer. Matthew Shay is president and CEO of the National Retail Federation in Washington, D.C. He holds a law degree from The Ohio State University and a masters in business administration from Georgetown University. Readers may write him at NRF, 1101 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005

Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Subscribe

View Comments

Guest Column——

Items of notes and interest from the web.


Sponsored