EPA estimates that the Draft rule would cost between $384 million and $460 million per year and have benefits of just $17 million, a cost benefit gap of more than 22 to 1.
China is clearly the world's largest user of coal by far and the world's largest emitter of carbon dioxide emissions and it has no intention of changing that direction
Affordable energy is essential to economic growth, and examples like Germany and Spain underscore how government attempts to pick winners and losers inevitably come at a cost
Promotion the growth of productive, sustainable, high-paying jobs in the energy sector: Federal government merely needs to reduce regulatory barriers and let the market operate
Judicious placement of grass, climbing ivy and other plants in urban canyons can reduce the concentration at street level of NO2 by as much as 40 percent
IPCC’s revised principles do not instill confidence that their future assessment reports will be any less biased than those of the past. In short, the con will go on