Remind me again of the rationale for a Hillary Clinton presidency, assuming there is anyone who seriously thinks one exists.
Supposedly, it's that she's tested, she knows her way around Washington, she's familiar with foreign affairs, etc. In other words, her resume establishes her as a person with the background and the knowledge to know what she's doing - plus the notion that she's supposedly sharp and talented, right? Isn't that basically it? That a Hillary presidency would be characterized by competence and know-how, from someone who's been around the block and can be counted on if nothing else to at least get the basic things right and understand the big picture?