A man banging on your door tells you your house is on fire. Right after that, a neighbor runs up - he's an enemy who's always wanted the land your house sits on - and tells you the one who warned you is a pathological liar and just wanted to disturb your peaceful Sunday. You go back to the tv, and your wife asks, "What was that all about?" You reply, "Oh, some nut was trying to tell me that our house was on fire." As the living room fills up with smoke, your wife asks, "Well, aren't you going to look into that?" You reply, "Oh, heck no! Fred assured me that the man is just a troublemaker." As flames belch out of the bedroom doors just down the hall, you look at your wife and ask, "What's for dinner?" Parallel to the above absurd scenario and much weirder, was what happened when Hillary's and John Podesta's emails were made public during our last election. A veritable barge of damning revelation exposing Hillary, her campaign, her campaign director, et al - the authenticity of which was completely confirmed by even the mightiest of the most liberal news-reporting institutions - were broadcast around the world in newspapers magazines, on television and computer screens. And the brainwave response from most of her constituency to all that REVEALING TRUTH was a flatline.

---

Support Canada Free Press

---