WhatFinger

A classic Clintonian response

Hillary's lawyer: Oh, THAT subpoena? See, it depends what the meaning of 'I've never' is


I wonder if there has ever been a married couple in the history of mankind that has had to send its lawyers out to clarify their statements more times than the Clintons have. I said what? That's been immediately exposed as a blatant lie? Fine, I meant something else. The really interesting stat, if we could ever uncover it, would be how often they've pull crap like this in their conversations with each other. You were where? With who? Then again, that assumes that either of them views it as a real marriage and not as an alliance of convenience for the sake of their respective political ambitions. I wouldn't lay odds there. But back to the matter at hand: When you say you've never had a subpoena - "I've" of course being a contraction of "I have," which means at no point right up to the present time - that clearly means never. Not then. Not now. Not ever. That's what it means, and that's what the words were clearly meant to convey.
Read Full Article...

Welcome to CFP’s Comment Section!

The Comment section of online publications is the new front in the ongoing Cancel Culture Battle.

Big Tech and Big Media are gunning for the Conservative Voice—through their Comment Sections.

Canada Free Press wishes to stay in the fight, and we want our fans, followers, commenters there with us.

We ask only that commenters keep it civil, keep it clean.

Thank You for your patience and for staying aboard the CFP ‘Mother Ship’.

READ OUR Commenting Policy


CFP Comments

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments


Support Canada Free Press

Donate


Recommended by Canada Free Press


Subscribe

Sponsored