Since the Iran nuclear deal was never submitted to the Senate as a treaty, the Obama Administration helpfully explains that there is no legal force behind it. It is, they tell us, merely a set of political promises. So despite the treatment of the deal as "landmark," how airtight do you suppose those promises might be when one party to the deal is a group of radical Islamic fanatics and the other party to the deal was led by John Kerry? Most of us figured the deal would never survive the arrival of the next U.S. president, but now it appears it may not make it out of the year in which it was negotiated (I almost said signed, but apparently that never happened) without the commencement of its own demise.

---

Support Canada Free Press

---