Obviously, during the last two elections, questions of voter fraud emerged as a major issue. Democrats like to claim it doesn't exist, which is utterly absurd. We know it exists. We just don't know the extent to which it occurs.
Still, anyone who dares to mention the possibility that various states have disastrously inaccurate voter rolls (and therefore the potential for widespread fraud) and you'll be shouted down or laughed right out the door. Dems will often argue that such fraud is "not widespread," but they're loathe to define what, exactly, 'widespread' means. How many bogus votes need to be cast before blue states care?
