I've often told you how highly I recommend Kim Strassel's Friday Potomac Watch column in the Wall Street Journal. Strassel is an excellent writer and she does a deep dive into things that are happening in Washington that no one else is telling you about. But while I admire Strassel's reporting skills, and I'm sure she's worked hard to cultivate sources, the fact of the matter is that most of the media could be culling the same information Strassel comes up with.
They just don't, either because they aren't interested or they don't think it would serve their ideological agenda.
So when Strassel today laid out what she called the "devastating case against a Clinton presidency" that was found in this week's WikiLeaks document dump, the real service she did for us was to bother pointing out what everyone else in the media could have and should have. It wouldn't be fair to excerpt as much as I want to - and before to click over and read the whole thing - but here are some choice highlights: