One of the ways you can tell the media's bias is from the descriptive words they use about something that happens. When a development is "landmark" or "historic," that means they're in love with it. When it's "controversial" or "divisive" . . . yeah, you get the idea.
So it's a measure of just how smitten with state power they've become that an international agreement designed to decimate the fossil fuels industry while putting crushing controls and regulations on all manufacturing - not to mention massive new taxes and fees - has got them throwing flowers and lecturing everyone about how they got the deal this time because "the world learned its lesson" from its previous failure to come up with a global warming deal.