I suppose Chuck Schumer had to come up with something to say. You're in a tough spot - as is your party - when you declare unconscionable the other side's intention not to confirm your president's election-year SCOTUS nominee, only to have it quickly revealed that you vowed the exact same thing eight years earlier when the tables were turned.
So how do you explain it away? Why, it's apples to oranges! It's not the same! That's what he's going to try, anyway: