So let me see if I have this straight. ABC News hires a guy whose primary experience is as a mouthpiece for the Clintons, and assigns him to report news objectively and without bias. Some time later we discover, to our horror, that he is contributing money (and more than he first admitted) to the slush-fund-disguised-as-a-charity that these very same Clintons use to line their pockets while shaking down foreign governments, making speeches for upwards of half-a-million dollars, and demanding the "toppling" of the damnable "1 percent."
And because of this revelation, we now face the heartbreaking possibility that George Stephanopoulos is not an objective journalist but is, in fact, a Clinton bootlicker?