Subscribe to Canada Free Press for FREE

USA Today and all other news outlets who aid and abet political opportunists, such as the Hillary Clinton-like Kirsten Gillibrand, should be judged for what they are: unprofessionally at work in the toilet known as today’s “journalism”.

MSM Playing in the Dem’s sexual harassment Toilet


By —— Bio and Archives--December 14, 2017

Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

Kirsten Gillibrand, Bill Clinton, Harvey Weistein
The ‘News’ is in the toilet and so are the minds of most elected Democrats.

So why should anyone be surprised that the USA Today’s editorial board has issued a statement concluding that: “A president who would all but call Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand a # is not fit to clean the toilets in the Barack Obama Presidential Library or to shine the shoes of George W. Bush.”

Notice US Today’s careful wording that President Trump “would all but call” Gillibrand a #, meaning that the president never did call Gillibrand a whore— but “would all but” call her that indecent and accursed name by putting words in his mouth.

“USA Today’s editorial board issued a sharp rebuke of President Trump’s attacks on Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand in which he said she “would do anything” for campaign donations. (Washington Examiner, Dec. 12, 2017)

“A president who would all but call Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand a # is not fit to clean the toilets in the Barack Obama Presidential Library or to shine the shoes of George W. Bush,” the paper’s editorial board wrote late Tuesday.”

USA Today has put it out there that President Trump is “not fit to clean the toilets in the Barack Obama Presidential Library”.

At this point in time the Barack Obama Presidential Library does not exist.  It exists only as the former Obama regime’s $1-billion dream, not scheduled to even open its doors until 2021.

There are also legions who would argue that given Obama’s attempts to allow transgenders into girls’ school washrooms, any toilet of Barack Obama is not a sexually safe place for Trump,  or school girls to even be.

As for Trump not being fit to “shine the shoes of George W. Bush”, USA Today did much more to Bush’s shoes than to shine them when he was in office.

This is how USA Today explains its hit on President Trump before going on to explain his “unique awfulness”: (USA Today, Dec. 12, 2017)

“This isn’t about the policy differences we have with all presidents or our disappointment in some of their decisions. Obama and Bush both failed in many ways. They broke promises and told untruths, but the basic decency of each man was never in doubt. 

“Donald Trump, the man, on the other hand, is uniquely awful. His sickening behavior is corrosive to the enterprise of a shared governance based on common values and the consent of the governed.

It should surprise no one how low he went with Gillibrand. When accused during the campaign of sexually harassing or molesting women in the past, Trump’s response was to belittle the looks of his accusers. Last October, Trump suggested that he never would have groped Jessica Leeds on an airplane decades ago: “Believe me, she would not be my first choice, that I can tell you.” Trump mocked another accuser, former People reporter Natasha Stoynoff, “Check out her Facebook, you’ll understand.”  Other celebrities and politicians have denied accusations, but none has stooped as low as suggesting that their accusers weren’t attractive enough to be honored with their gropes.”

The mainstream media joins Dem desperadoes in throwing poison darts in the ongoing, unhinged Word War, nested in Congress and now raging out of control.

Ever since the #MeToo crowd has fallen upon the ‘Dirty Old Man’ routine as a political strategy to take out their enemies by charging them as sexual harassers with no proof, the stability of the families of the—unproved— accused harassers remain at risk.

It is a fact that Gillibrand, one of the top leaders of the MeToos, accepted political donations from both alleged sexual predators movie mogul Harvey Weinstein and former President Bill Clinton, the latter of whom she only condemned when it became politically expedient.

In other words the politically ambitious Gillibrand only came forward about Clinton when it was too late.

Horses out of the barn never wait to be caught hanging out in anybody’s toilet.

All proven sexual harassers like Bill Clinton should have been—and should be—drummed out of office whether in the private or political arena.

People of both sexes should be charged when accusing their enemies of alleged sexual harassment with no proof.

Meanwhile, USA Today and all other news outlets who aid and abet political opportunists, such as the Hillary Clinton-like Kirsten Gillibrand, should be judged for what they are: unprofessionally at work in the toilet known as today’s “journalism”.


Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives | Comments

Copyright © Canada Free Press

RSS Feed for Judi McLeod
Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com.

Older articles by Judi McLeod

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.
-- Follow these instructions on registering: