Two cheers to the Washington Post for putting this together. They've been about the biggest Hillary shills this side of CNN throughout this entire campaign, but in this case they actually did their jobs and pointed out how Hillary's public statements before certain groups contradict what she said privately to others, as demonstrated by information WikiLeaks hacked from John Podesta's e-mail account.
We're mostly dealing here with trade and environmental policy here, and that's why the Post gets only two cheers. You get the sense that where they're disappointed in her, it's because they suspect she doesn't mean it when she publicly hues to more liberal positions on these issues. The biggest problem with Hillary is not how she constantly changes her positions depending on who she's talking with, although that is certainly a very big problem. The biggest problem is the positions we know she holds.
Even so, this is quite something: